Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorBorgh, G.J.C. van der
dc.contributor.authorMeulen, M.A. van der
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-21T18:00:14Z
dc.date.available2020-10-21T18:00:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/37981
dc.description.abstractIn August 2014, France authorised Operation Barkhane, aimed to ‘fight the cross-border terrorist threat’ in the Sahel, alongside the Sahelian armies. Six years later, instability has spread throughout the Sahel, while Operation Barkhane has increased its troops from 3,000 up to 5,100. This raises the question of what kind of counterinsurgency strategy Barkhane pursues in the Sahel. By using the analytical framework of ‘counterinsurgency’, this thesis analyses Operation Barkhane’s counterinsurgency and concludes that it is enemy-centric in nature. The thesis shows the complications of Operation Barkhane’s enemy-centric counterinsurgency strategy by using Barkhane’s operations in Burkina Faso as a case study. The case of Burkina Faso highlights the problematic preoccupation with the military aspect which decontextualises the ‘enemy’, focuses on the symptoms of the Sahelian crisis instead of on the root causes, and renders cooperation with the Sahelian governments unproblematic.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent4618475
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleOperation Barkhane: the risks of an enemy-centric approach
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsSahel; France; Operation Barkhane; Burkina; Burkina Faso; counterinsurgency; enemy-centric counterinsurgency; enemy-centric; counterterrorism; military interventions; Azar; Fulani; Liptako-Gourma; Liptako-Gourma region; conflict; Charbonneau; Wing; Powell; Guichaoua; Idrissa
dc.subject.courseuuConflict Studies and Human Rights


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record