Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorMassink, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorNoordende, M.M. van 't
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-06T18:00:38Z
dc.date.available2020-08-06T18:00:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/36820
dc.description.abstractThe concept of mercenaries with an apartheid past being hired by the same governments they had aimed to overthrow must seem outrageous to some. But this was exactly the nature of Executive Outcomes; the first of the Private Military Companies (PMC’s). It was the first to take advantage of a security vacuum that came into existence during the 1990’s, and it would prove to be a template for all Private Military Companies to follow. Naturally, because of its apartheid past Executive Outcomes was a controversial phenomenon and some have contributed its dissolution to the negative attention it received from the press. This controversy will be analysed with news articles from two newspapers, The Guardian and The Observer, as well as secondary literature. This thesis has found that both newspapers are often wary or unsupportive of Executive Outcomes, but also show irresolution because the firm often proved to be remarkably successful. This reflects academic debate but has also contributed to the company’s ability to profit from the situation.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent382730
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.language.isoen
dc.title"Colonizers or Saviours? ─ The Story of the Private Military Company Executive Outcomes in Sierra Leone, from the Perspective of The Guardian and The Observer."
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsPMC, PMC's, Executive Outcomes, Sierra Leone, Mercenaries, Neo-Colonialism
dc.subject.courseuuGeschiedenis


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record