Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorPrakken, H.
dc.contributor.authorGrotenhuis, Z.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-04T18:00:33Z
dc.date.available2020-08-04T18:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/36535
dc.description.abstractDiscussions that happen daily in our lives can be formalized into ab-stract frameworks that help us determine the dialectical status of thearguments given in the discussion. This study aims to contribute to ongo-ing research about different types of extensions to the abstract frameworkintroduced by Dung (1995). Specifically, it asks whether adding supportrelations increases efficiency or explainability when determining its statuswith relation to the old framework.After making a program to automate the evaluation of such frameworks,the results have indicated that there is no such increase. However, otherbenefits may be gained by adding support relations or by researching dif-ferent kinds of extensions to Dung’s framework. This is an interestingtopic for future research.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent287465
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleEfficiency and Explainability of Support Relations in Argumentation Frameworks
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsArgumentation Frameworks, Support Relations
dc.subject.courseuuKunstmatige Intelligentie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record