Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorTrappenburg, M.
dc.contributor.advisorBovens, M.A.P.
dc.contributor.authorSteenman, S.C.
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T17:00:54Z
dc.date.available2009-09-18
dc.date.available2009-09-18T17:00:54Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/3447
dc.description.abstractThe study analyses, from the assumption that micro level influences are more or less levelled-out, five different explanations for why Flemish children perform better in international standardised tests of literacy and numeracy (PISA, PIRLS and TIMSS) than Dutch children. Since the countries are very similar in general characteristics and education system characteristics, this difference in performance is puzzling. The study uses a wide array of quantitative methods and policy analysis to study the curriculum; special needs children inclusion policy; funding; teachers; and class size as explanations for this difference, disproving the usual explanation of curricular differences and showing that class size is most likely to explain the performance differences.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent1102753 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleExplaining the Flemish Lead: A multi-method analysis of explanations for the difference between performance of Dutch and Flemish children in literacy and numeracy.
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordseducation, primary school, school, class size, curriculum, children, inclusion, teacher, school funding
dc.subject.courseuuResearch in Public Administration and Organizational Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record