dc.description.abstract | In recent years, we have witnessed an upcoming ‘plant-based turn’ in food production. However, at least in the Netherlands, this trend seems to be stagnating. Hence in this research, I critically assess one of the main tactics used to realize a decrease in our dependency on animal products: plant-based product differentiation. Taking plant-based alternatives and substitutes for meat as example, I focus on various kinds of ‘product-differentiating activities’, and assess that such activities are problematic, since commodities are then presented too much as agents of change. Yet I maintain that one of the product-differentiating activities might withstand this criticism: presenting products as ‘experiential overridingness’, meaning that the ethical implications associated with plant-based food constitute a relevant background, while the direct experience of a product is moved to the foreground. I argue that this might foster an understanding of products as relevant but only limited contributors to tackling the many issues which plant-based producers claim to be able to solve solely through products. However, ‘experiential overridingness’ is strongly open for contextualization, since it places a strong emphasis on the product itself. Hence I will also focus more specifically on the context in which experiential overridingness might function: in a context of various issues and a diversity of potential courses of collective and individual attempts to mitigate the various issues. | |
dc.subject.keywords | Plant-based food, product differentiation, virtue ethics, commodity fetishism, greenwashing, moral pluralism, experiential overridingness, critical reflection, veganism, vegetarianism, animal agriculture, modernity, global poverty, climate change, environmental pollution, economic ethics, animal ethics, capitalism, Marxism, ecomodernism, Dark Mountain Project, Moral Psychology | |