Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorRaben, R.
dc.contributor.authorGröniger, W.J.H.
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-10T17:01:09Z
dc.date.available2009-09-10
dc.date.available2009-09-10T17:01:09Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/3292
dc.description.abstractThe thesis deals with two different approaches to agricultural development in Africa. The first one, aiming at bringing the Green Revolution to Africa, represents a high-input strategy. The other, advocating a populist approach, focuses on indigenous knowledge. The central question is what a historical analysis of the debate between the two different approaches imply with regard to Africa's agricultural development. In this case, the Sasakawa Global 2000 project in Ghana is taken as an example of a high-input strategy. To juxtapose this strategy, Paul Richards' 1985 publication Indigenous Agricultural Revolution is discussed.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent2288531 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleDebating Development - A historical analysis of the Sasakawa Global 2000 project in Ghana and indigenous knowledge as an alternative approach to agricultural development
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsagriculture development history Green Revolution indigenous knowledge West Africa
dc.subject.courseuuInternationale betrekkingen in historisch perspectief


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record