dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Adriaans, F.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Weerts, I.J.M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-02T17:00:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-02T17:00:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/32608 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigates what AI-technique works best for detecting and handling verbal irony. The effects of linguistic irony markers have also been taken into consideration. The AI-techniques have been examined through statistical analysis of chatbot replies in ironical human-computer conversations. It has been found that UltraHAL (pattern matching) handles irony significantly better, and that Rose (NLP meaning extraction/ChatScript) handles irony significantly worse, than others. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
dc.format.extent | 1495514 | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | The detection and handling of verbal irony in human-computer interaction: a comparison between four chatbots | |
dc.type.content | Bachelor Thesis | |
dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
dc.subject.keywords | Irony, language, linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, Human Computer Interaction, Computer Mediated Communication, pattern matching, Natural Language Processing | |
dc.subject.courseuu | Kunstmatige Intelligentie | |