Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorRuberg, W.
dc.contributor.authorCornish, A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-19T17:00:38Z
dc.date.available2018-09-19T17:00:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/31345
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates cultural perceptions of abortionists in nineteenth century Britain, as understood by the cultural turn of the history of medicine. I use the 1861 Offences Against the Persons Act as a reference point to examine the extent to which attitudes to abortionists shifted from sympathy to condemnation as the century progressed, alongside increased legal, medical and popular differentiation between regulated and lay practitioners. I argue that this is not evident in the historical record, which shows that attitudes were more contradictory, and a chronological progression of changes in attitudes cannot be mapped so easily. These perspectives can be revealed through the cultural history of medicine which helps us understand complicated and inconsistent attitudes towards different practitioners, mediation, discursive representations of abortionists, and socially constructed attitudes to reproduction, abortion and abortionists. These were multivocal and fluid, and can be traced through official texts such as court cases, trials, and the popular press.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent578064
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleBetween Hostility and Sympathy: Abortionists on Trial at the Old Bailey, London c. 1823 – 1899.
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsAbortion; abortionists; court cases; trials; popular press; nineteenth century Britain; cultural turn; history of medicine
dc.subject.courseuuCultuurgeschiedenis van modern Europa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record