Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorPelzer, P.
dc.contributor.advisorPotjer, S.P.
dc.contributor.authorBrandhorst, M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-03T17:00:45Z
dc.date.available2018-09-03T17:00:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/30808
dc.description.abstractThe growing network-based nature of society and increasing ‘wickedness’ of societal challenges incites the need for learning. Especially, in the field of spatial planning, since the desire for collaborative understanding and management of environmental transitions such as; the energy transition, urbanization and climate change, is growing. However, with and increased interest in learning a paradox emerged, whereby the importance of learning as a goal and process is recognized, but this process is not clearly examined. Therefore, this study provides insight into 'how' learning processes in a spatial planning context occur, conceptualizing three learning processes: single-loop, double-loop and triple-loop learning. Furthermore, the study illustrates the potential contribution of these processes on national policy trajectories.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent6099444
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.title'To learn or not to learn?' A study about the contribution of learning processes to national policy trajectories
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsLearning; policy trajectory; Nationale Omgevingsvisie; 'Proeftuin Nederland van Morgen'
dc.subject.courseuuSpatial Planning


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record