Two sides of the same coin? A Netherlands-based analysis of two contemporary feminist discourses.

dc.rights.license	CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisor	Olivieri, Domitilla
dc.contributor.author	Verbeek, E.M.
dc.date.accessioned	2018-07-29T17:00:42Z
dc.date.available	2018-07-29T17:00:42Z
dc.date.issued	2018
dc.identifier.uri	https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/29932
dc.description.abstract	This thesis is a critical analysis on the Dutch feminist movement while productively contributing to the question how it can sustain to be a movement for change. Feminism as a brand has become a widespread phenomenon, while on the other hand, questions about who is and who is not allowed to identify as feminist is common practice. These discourses are both build upon the idea of ‘inclusive feminism’, and focused on individual realities and experiences. What are the implications of this for the Dutch feminist movement and what are the opportunities for the future?
dc.description.sponsorship	Utrecht University
dc.format.extent	1166226
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.language.iso	en
dc.title	Two sides of the same coin? A Netherlands-based analysis of two contemporary feminist discourses.
dc.type.content	Master Thesis
dc.rights.accessrights	Open Access
dc.subject.keywords	feminism; Dutch; Netherlands; discourse;
dc.subject.courseuu	Comparative Women's Studies in Culture and Politics