Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorKros, M.
dc.contributor.advisorBuskens, V.W.
dc.contributor.authorDuvekot, R.A.
dc.contributor.authorWerve, L.C.F. van der
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-29T18:01:20Z
dc.date.available2018-01-29T18:01:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/28483
dc.description.abstractThis study examines whether prejudice against Dutch Moroccans and Turks can be explained by forced and voluntary contact and whether threat mediates this relationship. It tests Allport’s contact theory, the ethnic competition theory and how these two work together in the Dutch context. Using the NELLS data (2013) in regression analyses, we find that threat and both forced and voluntary contact are significant predictors of prejudice against Moroccans and Turks. On top of that, we find no significant relationship between neither forced nor voluntary contact and threat. Therefore, threat does not appear to mediate the relationship between contact and prejudice. Implications for further research are offered.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent465904
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isonl
dc.titleBeter een goede vriend dan een verre buur? Een onderzoek naar de relatie tussen contact en negatieve houdingen, het verschil tussen gedwongen en vrijwillig contact en de mediërende rol van dreiging.
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsContact; Gedwongen contact; Vrijwillig contact; Vriendschap; Buurtcontact; Ervaren dreiging; Negatieve houdingen; Xenofobie; Contacttheorie; Etnische competitietheorie.
dc.subject.courseuuSociologie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record