dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Pisters, M.F. | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Dijkstra, P.U. | |
dc.contributor.author | Schepers, M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-24T17:02:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-24T17:02:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/26299 | |
dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Working Alliance Inventory Rehabilitation Dutch Version (WAI-ReD) is a valid instrument for measuring therapeutic alliance within rehabilitation. A limitation of the WAI-ReD is its ceiling effects for all domains, in more than 15% of the patients. These effects affect the responsiveness of an instrument.
Objective: Determine if modifying response scales, by changing labels and utilizing visual analogue scales of the WAI-ReD will reduce ceiling effects.
Methods: The primary outcomes were the percentage of ceiling effects and the median scores on the total- and domain scores of the WAI-ReD and the two modified versions. As secondary outcomes, the construct validity and internal consistency of the modified versions were explored. The items of the original WAI-ReD are graded on a balanced Likert scale, the modified versions have a; (1) Likert scale with Positive-Packed labels (WAI-ReDPP); or (2) Visual Analogue Scale (WAI-ReDVAS). Adult patients from the Department of Rehabilitation of the University Medical Center Groningen and two physiotherapy practices were recruited. This study had a cross-sectional design. Participants randomly received one of the versions of the WAI-ReD.
Results: No ceiling effects were present in the total- or domain scores of the modified WAI-ReDVAS. Significantly (p≤ 0.05) fewer ceiling effects were found in the domains “Bond” and “Goal” of the WAI-ReDVAS compared to the WAI-ReD and WAI-RedPP. Ceiling effects were still present on the domains “Bond” and “Goal” of the WAI-ReDPP. Median outcomes of the modified versions were higher than the median outcome of the original version, but not significantly. The correlations (Pearson’s r) between the WAI-ReDVAS and similar validated instruments were high (r ≥ 0.70) . The internal consistency of the total- and domain scores of both modified versions were high (0.70 ≤ r < 0.95).
Conclusion: Utilizing visual analogue scales is an effective method to prevent ceiling effects on the total score and individual domains of the WAI-ReD. The clinimetric properties of the WAI-ReDVAS are superior compared to the WAI-ReD and WAI-ReDPP. The WAI-ReDVAS is therefore the recommended scale for measuring therapeutic alliances within rehabilitation.
Keywords: Rehabilitation, therapeutic alliance, ceiling effect. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
dc.format.extent | 238744 | |
dc.format.extent | 1434580 | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/zip | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | Reducing ceiling effects in the Working Alliance Inventory- Rehabilitation Dutch Version | |
dc.type.content | Master Thesis | |
dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
dc.subject.keywords | Rehabilitation, therapeutic alliance, ceiling effect. | |
dc.subject.courseuu | Fysiotherapiewetenschap | |