From everyday thought to cognitive science. Comparing; Crittenden, Dennett and Fodor.
| dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lievers, Dr. Menno | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schellen, I. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-11T18:00:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-11-11T18:00:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/24764 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The meaning of everyday thought is defended based on Wittgenstein's idea of 'very general facts of nature'. This leads into questions concerning the ontology of concepts. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
| dc.format.extent | 88908 | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/zip | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | From everyday thought to cognitive science. Comparing; Crittenden, Dennett and Fodor. | |
| dc.type.content | Bachelor Thesis | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Very general fact is nature; CTM; RTM. | |
| dc.subject.courseuu | Wijsbegeerte |