Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorBehrisch, L.
dc.contributor.authorLeeuwen, W.J. van
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-08T17:00:37Z
dc.date.available2016-09-08T17:00:37Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/24204
dc.description.abstractThe cameral sciences originated in the practice of the seventeenth century Kammer, the administrative heart of the German states. To be able to afford a standing army, German states started to look at ways to stimulate the economy and increase yields from mines, forests and agriculture on the ruler’s domains. Throughout the eighteenth century Cameralism functioned as the theoretical framework for the education of the administrative workforce. However, at the end of the eighteenth century cameralisms influence declined. In this thesis I used Lindenfeld’s claim, that it was internal reform that eventually led to the disintegration of the cameral sciences as, as the general historical framework for my research. However, my focus will be on the ramifications of the introduction of Glückseligkeit as the new general directive for cameralism. The different definitions and uses of Glückseligkeit will function as the prism through which it is possible to analyse the internal fragmentation and reform that ultimately led to the dissolution of the cameral sciences.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent154852
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zip
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleThe sources of Glückseligkeit Cameralism and the public debate at the Kameral Hohe Schule in Lautern (1774-1790)
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsCameralist, science of state, Glückseligkeit, Hohe Kameras Schule, Eighteenth century, 1774-1790, German states
dc.subject.courseuuGeschiedenis


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record