Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorBrink, Mr. dr. A. van den
dc.contributor.authorUrbanová, G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-06T17:01:25Z
dc.date.available2016-09-06T17:01:25Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/24191
dc.description.abstractThe European Union, in attempt to deal with the mass migration influx, decided on a mandatory quota for relocation of asylum seekers, for all Member States. The Countries of the V4 group, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and the Czech Republic, have been demonstrating a position of non-compliance with the quotas, for varying reasons. This paper follows the reasons for the objections posed by these countries both individually and as a unified group, while examining the political and legal instruments applied in the procedure. Through theories of European integration, this paper puts up hypotheses about the intergovernmental approach of the V4 states, as well as identifies unique cultural and historical common perception shaping the perspective of the group to the crisis.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent894813
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleV4 OBJECTION TO THE MANDATORY RELOCATION QUOTAS
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsVisegrad Group, V4, European Integration, Relocation Asylum Quota, Opposition, European Union, Slovakia vs. Council
dc.subject.courseuuEuropean Governance


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record