Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorVorstenbosch, Jan
dc.contributor.authorMerriënboer, J. van
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-18T17:00:49Z
dc.date.available2016-08-18T17:00:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/23609
dc.description.abstractAuthenticity has often been interpreted as ‘being true to oneself,’ which implies that there is some true self within that we ought to be guided by. I propose two influences to be the main reasons for why this understanding of authenticity has come to be: the unconscious, which gives us reason to suspect that our actions spring from a deep lying self; and the public sphere, which has been disenchanted and given merely instrumental importance, resulting in a search for meaning within oneself. I consider two problems with the idea of a true self: the first is that it reduces Will to Necessity which ends up reducing our sense of freedom by assuming our actions to necessarily follow from a causal chain instead of our Will planning for a future that is yet entirely uncertain. The second problem is that the true self, if it were to exist, could not act as a guide on how to live one’s life; it could only give us knowledge which cannot motivate action, and is meaningless since truth cannot result from the thinking activity which meaning springs from.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent905716
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleBeing Authentic: Two Problems with the Idea of a True Self
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordstrue self; authenticity; Hannah Arendt; thinking; will; freedom; necessity; Freud; unconscious; meaning; uncertainty
dc.subject.courseuuWijsbegeerte


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record