Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorVerhoeff, Nanna
dc.contributor.authorStevens, M.M.A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T17:00:54Z
dc.date.available2016-07-20T17:00:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/22831
dc.description.abstractActor Andy Serkis is said to be the king of the motion capture technology. However, whether he truly deserves this title seems to be debatable. As motion capture actor for Gollum in THE LORD OF THE RINGS, you don’t actually see him on-screen. What you do see is a digitally rendered and enhanced version of him. This has raised many questions in popular discourses about where the role of the actor ends and where the animator’s begins. Film scholar Scott Balcerzak has an interesting view in this debate: he says that what’s left of Andy Serkis in Gollum is his aura. Since aura is a much redefined concept – with deferring thoughts on the stay or decay of aura – it can deliver interesting insights in how the debate on Serkis’ role in the creation of Gollum has developed in different discourses.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent862102
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isonl
dc.titleWHOSE GOB OF SPIT IS IT? - Een analyse van de manier waarop het begrip aura inzicht kan bieden in verschillende perspectieven op het ambacht van de motion capture acteur
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsAndy Serkis, Gollum, motion capture, aura, Lord of the Rings, auteur, transparantie, hypermedialiteit, index, icon, paratekst
dc.subject.courseuuFilm- en Televisiewetenschap


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record