Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorHooijer, G.A.
dc.contributor.advisorBarkema, H.
dc.contributor.authorMil, M.A.P. van
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-14T17:00:37Z
dc.date.available2016-07-14T17:00:37Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/22660
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy of a topical treatment spray for digital dermatitis (DD) was compared with oxytetracycline (OTC) spray, as a positive control, and a negative control on a 566-cow, freestall dairy farm in Alberta, Canada as a sub-project in a 10-farm study. The treatment consisted of a topical spray containing aloe vera plant extracts together with copper and zinc chelates as active substances (Hoof-Sol). After cleaning of the hind feet with water, DD lesions (stages M0-4.1) were identified using a bright headlamp and a mirror on a spatula. DD lesions were sequentially randomly assigned to one of three treatments: Hoof-Sol, OTC spray and negative control, using a randomization sheet. The three treatments were administered as a spray in blinded spray bottles. At the following parlor inspection (one week later), the lesions treated in the preceding week were reevaluated. When M1-M4.1 (M+) DD lesions were still the same at the next inspection or changed to another stages (except M0), a re-treatment with the same treatment as the previous week was applied. Cure was defined as an M+ lesion transitioned in an M0 lesion. Every hind foot with an M+ lesion enrolled at week 1 was followed until week 8 and treated weekly. The proportion of M+ lesions not cured after 8 weeks of treatment was 0.86 for Hoof-Sol (95% CI: 0.76 to 0.96) and 0.61 for OTC (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.74), which showed that the efficacy of OTC is higher than Hoof-Sol (P=0.005). The proportion of remaining M+ lesions for the negative control was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.98). The efficacy of Hoof-Sol for treatment of DD was therefore not different from the negative control (P=0.51), whereas OTC was more effective than the negative control (P=0.0003). M+ lesions were divided in active lesions (M1, M2 and M4.1) and in chronic lesions (M3 and M4). Comparing the different treatments in week 8, no difference was found for these various lesion stages. Except for the proportion of active lesions treated with OTC. The proportion was lower than for the negative control (P=0.0121).
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent334914
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleEfficacy of Digital Dermatitis treatment with non-antibiotic Hoof-Sol spray in dairy cattle
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsDigital Dermatitis; topical treatment; dairy cattle
dc.subject.courseuuGezondheidszorg landbouwhuisdieren en vet. volksgezondheid


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record