Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorMalcontent, P.A.M.
dc.contributor.authorVerheijke, H.J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-06T17:03:01Z
dc.date.available2012-09-06
dc.date.available2012-09-06T17:03:01Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/20467
dc.description.abstractTransitional justice and its ultimate goal - reconciliation - for indigenous peoples in nation-states which have arisen out of settler colonialism, presents a difficult challenge. In the two nation-states this thesis draws a comparison between, Australia and Canada, a clear socioeconomic divide exists between the indigenous and non-indigenous population. This, in combination with other factors, hinders a sustainable reconciliation process. Much has been written on this ongoing struggle, yet a comparison between the two countries has not yet been made, at least not from a reconciliation point of view. This thesis therefore aims to bridge that hiatus in literature, by assessing as to what extent both countries can benefit from each others best experiences with regard to achieving reconciliation with their indigenous inhabitants.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent1044676 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleBreaching The Guilt Taboo: Comparing Australian and Canadian initiatives, policies and approaches concerning their indigenous populations, from a reconciliation perspective
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsIndigenous peoples
dc.subject.keywordsaborigines
dc.subject.keywordsreconciliation
dc.subject.keywordstransitional justice
dc.subject.keywordssettler societies
dc.subject.keywordsAustralia
dc.subject.keywordsCanada
dc.subject.courseuuInternationale betrekkingen in historisch perspectief


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record