Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorHout, M. van den
dc.contributor.authorMheen, M. van der
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-16T18:00:57Z
dc.date.available2014-12-16T18:00:57Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/19018
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the sensitivity of the assessment of treatment progress and outcome in anxiety disorders through diagnosis-specific versus generic routine outcome monitoring (ROM) instruments. Adults (N = 160) diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder with (PDA) or without agoraphobia (PD), or social anxiety disorder (SAD) received outpatient treatment at the Altrecht Academic Anxiety Centre. Each patients’ treatment outcome was assessed through two generic assessment instruments and two diagnosis-specific assessment instruments. The results show a subtle pattern, such that the differences between pre- and post-treatment assessments appeared to be larger for diagnosis-specific assessment instruments and the generic Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) than for the generic Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45). Implications for the current findings are discussed.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent813474
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleROM in anxiety disorders: Diagnosis-specific and generic assessment instruments
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.courseuuKlinische en Gezondheidspsychologie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record