dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ruberg, W.G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Geerestein, A. van | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-23T17:00:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-23T17:00:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/18409 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis deals with knowledge practices in nineteenth-century Dutch cases of criminal poisoning involving arsenic. Using theories from Science and Technology Studies, it examines the production and circulation of forensic knowledge. Starting off with a praxiographic approach to the chemical and medical practices involved in these cases, this thesis examines how arsenic was made visible and how it was enacted. Forensic toxicology in particular plays a part in making the invisible visible through science. Applying Mol’s concept of enactment to the forensic investigatory methods will show what arsenic is in the locality and context of a judicial investigation. Subsequently the issue of expertise is addressed; denoting the expert as a social and cultural construct. The expert and the Dutch law both play an important role in the circulation of forensic knowledge; an inhibiting as well as a beneficial one. When examining the circulation of knowledge, this thesis will make use of the STS concepts of ‘contact zones’ and travelling knowledge. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
dc.format.extent | 702518 | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | Tracing the Invisible. The gathering and circulation of forensic knowledge in nineteenth-century Dutch cases of criminal poisoning | |
dc.type.content | Master Thesis | |
dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
dc.subject.keywords | forensic, science and technology studies, praxiography, criminal poisoning, arsenic, expertise | |
dc.subject.courseuu | Cultuurgeschiedenis | |