Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorRuberg, W.G.
dc.contributor.authorGeerestein, A. van
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-23T17:00:50Z
dc.date.available2014-09-23T17:00:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/18409
dc.description.abstractThis thesis deals with knowledge practices in nineteenth-century Dutch cases of criminal poisoning involving arsenic. Using theories from Science and Technology Studies, it examines the production and circulation of forensic knowledge. Starting off with a praxiographic approach to the chemical and medical practices involved in these cases, this thesis examines how arsenic was made visible and how it was enacted. Forensic toxicology in particular plays a part in making the invisible visible through science. Applying Mol’s concept of enactment to the forensic investigatory methods will show what arsenic is in the locality and context of a judicial investigation. Subsequently the issue of expertise is addressed; denoting the expert as a social and cultural construct. The expert and the Dutch law both play an important role in the circulation of forensic knowledge; an inhibiting as well as a beneficial one. When examining the circulation of knowledge, this thesis will make use of the STS concepts of ‘contact zones’ and travelling knowledge.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent702518
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleTracing the Invisible. The gathering and circulation of forensic knowledge in nineteenth-century Dutch cases of criminal poisoning
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsforensic, science and technology studies, praxiography, criminal poisoning, arsenic, expertise
dc.subject.courseuuCultuurgeschiedenis


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record