Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorKessler, Drs. C.J.
dc.contributor.advisorvan den Hoven, Dr. M.A.
dc.contributor.authorHilberdink, W.J.A.
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-05T17:00:45Z
dc.date.available2014-08-05T17:00:45Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/17479
dc.description.abstractIn response to a motion proposed in 2007 by the members of the British Medical Association to charge parents of obese children with neglect, this thesis explores whether or not the childhood obesity epidemic could justify state interventions. And if so: which kind of state interventions could be ethically justified and what conditions should these interventions meet? A comprehensive answer to this question is provided by analysing if childhood obesity could indeed constitute parental neglect and by applying the moral philosophy of Joel Feinberg. After discussing the necessary conditions state interventions aimed at preventing or decreasing childhood obesity should meet, a guideline is proposed to make a clear distinction between ethical and unethical forms of state intervention.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent976818
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleThe Child's Right To A Lean Future: Ethical Justification of State Interventions in Cases of Childhood Obesity
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordschildhood obesity, state intervention, harm principle, welfare interests, parental neglect, open future, saggy skin, stewardship model, paternalism
dc.subject.courseuuApplied Ethics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record