Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorCorver, N.F.M.
dc.contributor.advisorThiersch, C.L.
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, A.H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-05T17:00:41Z
dc.date.available2014-08-05T17:00:41Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/17469
dc.description.abstractPast participle agreement in Western Romance displays cross-linguistic differences that have not yet been adequately explained in the linguistic literature of the past 30+ years, especially the oft-cited difference between Italian and French: Italian direct object wh-phrases (wh-DOs) do not trigger PPA, while French ones do. In this thesis, I explore the facts and generalizations in the PPA data more deeply, providing an exploratory yet thorough investigation of the areas in which PPA occurs as well as an investigation of the properties of the direct object clitics (DO-clitics) and partitive clitics which trigger PPA in these Romance languages. In doing so, I evaluate some of the options that may eventually lead to a satisfactory explanation of cross-linguistic PPA patterns.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent641240
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleOn Romance Past Participle Agreement and Its Challenges
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordspast participles, past participle agreement, object clitics, clitics, partitive clitics, agreement, syntax
dc.subject.courseuuLinguistics: the Study of the Language Faculty


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record