Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorZwarts, J.
dc.contributor.authorWaard, M.S. de
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-25T17:01:12Z
dc.date.available2014-07-25T17:01:12Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/17174
dc.description.abstractThe Dutch noun 'soort', 'kind (of)', can have different interpretations in different binominal constructions. 'Dat soort X', 'that kind of X', always refers to a subclass of X, whereas 'een soort X', 'a kind of X', can refer to a (non-prototypical) subclass of X, or to something which resembles, but does not belong to the concept X. For example, a pencil is not 'a pen', but it is 'a kind of pen.' This thesis investigates whether it is possible to provide a unified semantic analysis for the Dutch noun 'soort', 'kind (of)', despite the different interpretations it can have. Are these different interpretations semantic or pragmatic in nature?
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent1254515
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleThis is a kind of thesis: a unified semantic analysis for the Dutch noun soort, 'kind', in binominal constructions
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsconceptual semantics, dutch, kind of constructions
dc.subject.courseuuLinguistics: the Study of the Language Faculty


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record