Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorVisser, A.
dc.contributor.advisorBrink, B. vd
dc.contributor.authorVerrópoulos, A.M.
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-24T17:01:22Z
dc.date.available2012-08-24
dc.date.available2012-08-24T17:01:22Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/15178
dc.description.abstractIn the traditional conception of science, science needs to be autonomous from society and its values in order to maintain its integrity and the objectivity of its knowledge. This amounts to the claim that science is "value-free". This thesis aims to answer two questions, namely whether science is value-free, and if so, whether its knowledge and applications can contribute to social progress. To answer these questions, I made use of the feminist philosophy of science from Helen E. Longino and the critical theory of Herbert Marcuse. Marcuse shows that if science is value-free, it cannot be socially responsible. Science needs to be valorized, and Longino has a proposal for such a valorization. This thesis is relevant for the contemporary discussion with respect to the problems associated with the commercialization of scientific research.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent647553 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titlePotentiality and actuality: a multi-dimensional critique on value-free science
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsvalues, science, value-free, Longino, Marcuse, valorization, autonomy, value-neutrality, objectivity
dc.subject.courseuuHistory and Philosophy of Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record