Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorKoppen, J.M. van
dc.contributor.authorGeutjes, J.J.H.H.
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-23T17:00:45Z
dc.date.available2012-08-23
dc.date.available2012-08-23T17:00:45Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/14755
dc.description.abstractThe Dutch language is generally considered to be V2. However, in some cases the finite verb appears in the third position, creating a V3-sentence. Usually temporal and locative adverbs preceding the verb are involved in this type of sentences. Three authors, Barbiers (1995), Van Craenenbroeck (n.d.) and Haegeman (2010) each give an explanation for this syntactic phenomenon. This bachelor thesis reviews these explanations and compares them. A unified theory of Van Craenenbroeck’s and Haegeman’s account will prove to be the best explanation for the Dutch V3-construction.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent218690 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isonl
dc.titleV3 in het Nederlands
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsV3, Nederlands, linker periferie, scene-setting adverbs
dc.subject.courseuuTaal- en cultuurstudies


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record