dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Keijzer, M.C.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Duursma, J.M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-22T17:01:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-22 | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-22T17:01:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/14667 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study has researched on a small scale how improvement in second language proficiency can be measured. For example, the following two sentences are both written by the same student, but at different stages of university-level ESL instruction. Sentence A: “Our world has been a place for men for a very long time.” Sentence B: “On the contrary, the use of new technologies such as mobile phones and especially the Internet, [sic] has resulted in an extended social life which allows people to participate more in society.” (Student 1, see Appendix A) Both sentence A and B voice opinions, however, the latter provides much more information than the former. When comparing these two sentences on grammatical and lexical complexity, sentence B scores higher on both accounts. This example demonstrates exactly what this study focuses on; does progress in lexical and grammatical complexity occur through proficiency courses. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
dc.format.extent | 359309 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/msword | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.title | Measuring Progress in Second Language Proficiency
A concise study on progress with lexical and grammatical complexity in written proficiency tests of students of English | |
dc.type.content | Bachelor Thesis | |
dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
dc.subject.keywords | English Second Language, language acquisition, language proficiency, T-units, lexical complexity, grammatical complexity | |
dc.subject.courseuu | Engelse taal en cultuur | |