| dc.description.abstract | In this study we investigated how syntactic complexity affects speaking performance in first
(L1) and second language (L2) in terms of three measures of fluency: (1) breakdown
fluency; (2) speed fluency; and (3) repair fluency. Participants (30 Dutch native speakers
with an advanced level of English) performed two speaking experiments, one in Ducth (L1)
and one in English (L2). Syntactic complexity was operationalized in four conditions, active
vs. passive/nested vs. juxtaposed, and was found to affect the three types of fluency in
different ways, and differently for L1 and L2. In passives as compared with actives, we
found longer pauses, a lower total speaking duration, and a larger number of filled pauses
and corrections. With respect to the nested and juxtaposed contrast, longer pauses were
found in juxtaposed sentences. However, in terms of total speaking duration, and number of
filled pauses and corrections, nested sentences were found to be more disfluent. Although
results from total speaking duration in active and passive conditions, and from duration of
pauses at the speech onset position in nested and juxtaposed conditions, had different effect
across English and Dutch, the distinction between L1 and L2 were found to be significant.
The overall results showed that participants were more fluent in their L1 than in their L2. | |
