Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorTuin, I. van der
dc.contributor.authorGeerts, E.
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-20T17:00:58Z
dc.date.available2012-08-20
dc.date.available2012-08-20T17:00:58Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/14123
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the Oedipalized reception history, or the Oedipal feminist stories that have been told about the oeuvres of feminist philosophers Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray. Due to a combination of the existence of an Oedipal generational dialectics in feminism, the Anglo-American construction of the category of ‘French feminism,’ and the many mistranslations and misinterpretations of these oeuvres, (mostly) Anglo-American fixating narratives have been told about these feminist philosophies, which, in their turn, have led to a problematic and stifling dichotomy of Irigarayian versus Beauvoirian feminism and philosophy. This thesis project, which has to be located in the domains of feminist philosophy and theory, works towards another, more feminist, an-Oedipal and diffractive rereading of these two oeuvres, in order to make these philosophies fruitful for each other, and for feminist theory and politics.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent1262243 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleThe Other Woman. Towards a diffractive rereading of the oeuvres of Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray.
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsphilosophy, feminist philosophy, feminist theory, sexual difference philosophy, French feminism, Luce Irigaray, Simone de Beauvoir, Judith Butler, Karen Barad, feminist narratives, Oedipalization, diffractive reading, the an-Oedipal, otherness
dc.subject.courseuuGender and Ethnicity


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record