dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Kalis, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuiper, O.X. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-25T17:01:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-25 | |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-25T17:01:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/13413 | |
dc.description.abstract | I will focus on what I believe is an interesting way to regard the tension between the theories of two influential authors on the subject of free will: P.F. Strawson and Derk Pereboom. These two philosophers signifying two major trends in the discourse on free will. I propose a way of looking at the discussion between these two thinkers based on varying levels of description, using work of Thomas Nagel. In line with Thomas Nagel, I will try to explain the discord between Strawson and Pereboom as stemming from essentially different assumptions about how we should perceive ourselves in this world as we engage in philosophy. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
dc.format.extent | 473599 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | Freedom from two Perspectives: Strawson and Pereboom | |
dc.type.content | Bachelor Thesis | |
dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
dc.subject.keywords | Free will, Nagel, Strawson, Pereboom | |
dc.subject.courseuu | Wijsbegeerte | |