dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lievers, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rellum, R.C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-25T17:01:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-25 | |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-25T17:01:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/13353 | |
dc.description.abstract | A strong intuition about perception is that what we perceive when we perceive an object is a mind-independent object. However, this does not explain the possibility of hallucinations and illusions, since in both cases there is no direct relation between a subject and an object. Various solutions have been proposed to this problem of perception. One of them is the matching view, defended by Michelle Montague. I argue that this account of perception provides a plausible solution to this problem of perception. In order to do this, I will draw on the sense-datum theory, intentionalism and disjunctivism. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
dc.format.extent | 276018 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | Perceptions and Hallucinations: The Matching View as a Plausible Theory of Perception | |
dc.type.content | Bachelor Thesis | |
dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
dc.subject.keywords | perception, hallucination, direct realism, indirect realism, sense-datum theory, intentionalism, disjunctivism, matching view | |
dc.subject.courseuu | Wijsbegeerte | |