Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorLievers, M.
dc.contributor.authorRellum, R.C.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-25T17:01:24Z
dc.date.available2013-07-25
dc.date.available2013-07-25T17:01:24Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/13353
dc.description.abstractA strong intuition about perception is that what we perceive when we perceive an object is a mind-independent object. However, this does not explain the possibility of hallucinations and illusions, since in both cases there is no direct relation between a subject and an object. Various solutions have been proposed to this problem of perception. One of them is the matching view, defended by Michelle Montague. I argue that this account of perception provides a plausible solution to this problem of perception. In order to do this, I will draw on the sense-datum theory, intentionalism and disjunctivism.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent276018 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titlePerceptions and Hallucinations: The Matching View as a Plausible Theory of Perception
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsperception, hallucination, direct realism, indirect realism, sense-datum theory, intentionalism, disjunctivism, matching view
dc.subject.courseuuWijsbegeerte


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record