| dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ruberg, Willemijn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Verdoes, T.S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-02-21T18:02:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-02-21 | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-02-21T18:02:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/12629 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis argues that language is a useful tool to prove that single-issue terrorists (who only have one goal) are less isolated from their direct environment than revolutionary terrorists (who want a radical change to society) are. It compares two different case studies, namely the Army of God (single-issue terrorism) and the Rote Armee Faction (revolutionary terrorism). | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
| dc.format.extent | 673016 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | Us Versus Them: a comparative discourse analysis of a terrorist's constituency comparing Revolutionary terrorism and single-issue terrorism | |
| dc.type.content | Bachelor Thesis | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Terrorism, language, constituency, Rote Armee Faction, Army of God, single-issue terrorism | |
| dc.subject.courseuu | Geschiedenis | |
