dc.description.abstract | Key performance indicators have been around for a long time; organizations
tend to provide their employees with metrics on strategic levels, such as marketshare
or profitability. Next to the key performance indicators that serve the
strategic vision of an organization, tactical and operational levels are also
influenced by metrics. By using metrics and performance indicators,
organizations aim to influence the awareness of employees on targets on a
personal and organizational level. Performance increases are bound to occur,
when employees are made conscious of their personal results by using metrics.
However, an abundance of current definitions of metrics and performance
indicators overwhelm employees with values which are hard to grasp. By
defining key performance indicators, relating to goals and strategic aspects of the
organizations; meaningful indicators can be defined on an operational and
tactical level, therefore, prevent cognitive and operational overload.
This research focuses on the key aspects of defining key performance indicators
by studying literature containing metrics, the metrics studied are often used in
the field in which an organization operates. These metrics are compared to the
ones, which are currently employed within the organization’s structure. As a
result of comparing data and active metrics, a selection of key metrics is
provided to the organization. The availability of these key metrics, enable
organizations to focus on the business, instead of defining metrics.
The key performance metrics are extracted from literature and available data is
used in the Rule Extraction Matrix (REM) Method. This method is constructed
using several aspects of current data mining methods. One of the applicable data
mining methods is the CRISPDM model, which provides a solid base to
determine the nominal value of a performance metric. The method provides
ways to bond the performance metrics, using business rules, and thus leaving
room for an interpretation of these rules using a decision support system.
The REM method enables organizations to manage their performance by using
bounded metrics and extract business rules, business rules are responsible for
providing thresholds to the extracted key performance indicators. Validation of
the REM method is performed by an extensive case study at a large Dutch
Telephone and Internet services provider and expert interviews were performed.
The REM method is an addition to the performance measurement field and
further enhances an organization’s ability to define their performance. Moreover,
the REM method is applicable to a variety of organizations given the following
requisite: historical performance measurements must be available. | |
dc.subject.keywords | Key words: key performance indicators, business rules, Rule Extraction Matrix
method, REM, CRISPDM, performance measurement, decision support, key
metrics, data mining, method fragments, method engineering | |