Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorVorstenbosch, J.
dc.contributor.authorSouza, O.Q.H. de
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-21T17:01:05Z
dc.date.available2012-09-21
dc.date.available2012-09-21T17:01:05Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/11603
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis I examine the obligations imposed on zoos by European Commission Directive 1999/22/EC. I ask to what extent there is a moral obligation to compensate zoos for the costs incurred as a result of participating in captive breeding programmes. I present a conceptual framework for discussing different types of public and private goods based on (1) an input of labour, (2) the locus of a benefit, and (3) the presence or absence of a legal compulsion. I conclude that there is indeed a moral basis for a compensatory form of public funding.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent5158197 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleThe Ethics of Zoo Licensing and Funding in the Netherlands
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordssubsidy
dc.subject.keywordszoos
dc.subject.keywordszoo licensing
dc.subject.keywordszoo funding
dc.subject.keywordsEC Directive 1999/22/EC
dc.subject.keywordsDierentuinenbesluit
dc.subject.keywordsRotterdam Zoo
dc.subject.keywordsBlijdorp Zoo
dc.subject.keywordsEAZA
dc.subject.keywordsNVD
dc.subject.keywordsENDCAP
dc.subject.keywordszoo inspections
dc.subject.keywordscaptive breeding
dc.subject.keywordsbiodiversity
dc.subject.keywordseducation
dc.subject.keywordsscientific research
dc.subject.keywordscharitable zoo
dc.subject.courseuuApplied Ethics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record