dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Rigney, Ann | |
dc.contributor.author | Wouden, Y.H. van der | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-10T17:00:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-10 | |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-10T17:00:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/10771 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper I will investigate the changes memory studies, as well as the sheer act of remembering, have undergone in the past eighty-odd years. To do so I will concentrate on one of the most famous contemporary symbols of remembrence: Anne Frank. By sketching the path that her story took through Western media, into globalised media and politics, I will try to distinguish and analyse the different narratives surrounding the story of Anne Frank. Touching on subjects such as the Holocaust Industry, third-generation literature and Israeli-American relations, I hope to explain how Anne Frank's symbol has changed in what it stands for, changed according to what the society remembering it is looking for. To further underline this, I will turn to two very recent works of literature. Shalom Auslander's "Hope: A Tragedy", and Nathan Englander's "What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank". | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
dc.format.extent | 275509 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | Anne Frank and the Irony of the Subverted Victim | |
dc.type.content | Bachelor Thesis | |
dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
dc.subject.keywords | Anne Frank, Holocaust Industry, Israel, America, Memory Studies, victimhood, the holocaust, third-generation, second-generation, | |
dc.subject.courseuu | Literatuurwetenschap | |