Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorRigney, Ann
dc.contributor.authorWouden, Y.H. van der
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-10T17:00:59Z
dc.date.available2012-07-10
dc.date.available2012-07-10T17:00:59Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/10771
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I will investigate the changes memory studies, as well as the sheer act of remembering, have undergone in the past eighty-odd years. To do so I will concentrate on one of the most famous contemporary symbols of remembrence: Anne Frank. By sketching the path that her story took through Western media, into globalised media and politics, I will try to distinguish and analyse the different narratives surrounding the story of Anne Frank. Touching on subjects such as the Holocaust Industry, third-generation literature and Israeli-American relations, I hope to explain how Anne Frank's symbol has changed in what it stands for, changed according to what the society remembering it is looking for. To further underline this, I will turn to two very recent works of literature. Shalom Auslander's "Hope: A Tragedy", and Nathan Englander's "What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank".
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent275509 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleAnne Frank and the Irony of the Subverted Victim
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsAnne Frank, Holocaust Industry, Israel, America, Memory Studies, victimhood, the holocaust, third-generation, second-generation,
dc.subject.courseuuLiteratuurwetenschap


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record