The Second-Person Standpoint and the Normative Question
dc.rights.license | CC-BY-NC-ND | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Schaubroeck, K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Weelden, W. van | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-06T17:01:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-06 | |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-06T17:01:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/10733 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper I explore Darwall’s view of the second-person standpoint. My research question is: Does Darwall’s second-person standpoint provide an account of why agents should be moral? In order to answer this question I will first give an account of Darwall’s theory and how Darwall tries to answer the normative question. Next I will show how Darwall’s answer to the normative question fails and why his theory cannot but fail to answer the normative question. Lastly, I will argue for a revised form of Darwall’s second-person standpoint that does provide an answer to the normative question. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Utrecht University | |
dc.format.extent | 273663 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | The Second-Person Standpoint and the Normative Question | |
dc.type.content | Bachelor Thesis | |
dc.rights.accessrights | Open Access | |
dc.subject.keywords | Second-Person Standpoint | |
dc.subject.keywords | Darwall | |
dc.subject.keywords | Korsgaard | |
dc.subject.keywords | Normative question | |
dc.subject.keywords | metaethics | |
dc.subject.keywords | moral skepticism | |
dc.subject.courseuu | Wijsbegeerte |