Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorPhilips, J.P.M.
dc.contributor.authorOosterbeek, E.J.
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-29T17:00:49Z
dc.date.available2012-05-29
dc.date.available2012-05-29T17:00:49Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/10451
dc.description.abstractThis paper (in Dutch) discusses consequentialistic (Philip Pettit) and deontological (John Rawls) moral theories from the hermeneutic perspective proposed by Paul Ricoeur. It is suggested that from a hermeneutic perspective the antagonistic contrast between consequentialistic and deontological positions changes into a dialectical contrast. This could mean that in stead of prescriptive, the moral theories discussed are to be considered as descriptive and evaluative, and that normativity doesn't follow from prescription, but from the moral appeal that a moral theory makes.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent840490 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isonl
dc.titleDialectiek van de moraal. Consequentialistische en deontologische theorieën in een hermeneutisch prespectief
dc.type.contentBachelor Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsConsequentialism, Deontology, Hermeneutics, Ricoeur, Pettit, Rawls
dc.subject.courseuuWijsbegeerte


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record