Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorPeeters, M.C.W.
dc.contributor.authorDijkman, A.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-30T17:00:52Z
dc.date.available2012-03-30
dc.date.available2012-03-30T17:00:52Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/10249
dc.description.abstractIn recent proactivity literature, it is recommended to study how supervisors appraise proactive behavior, because of the mixed findings of positive and negative consequences for employees (e.g. Bolino et al., 2010; Grant & Ashford, 2008). The present research responded to this call. Using a sample of 153 supervisor-employee dyads, I explored the influence of attributed motives of supervisors on the appraisal of proactive behaviors of their employees. Findings suggest that the attributed performance-enhancement motive is the most important predictor of supervisor’s appraisal. Also, employees’ affective organizational commitment as perceived by supervisors was found to significantly explain the appreciation, and supervisors’ role breadth self efficacy the desirability of proactive behavior. Implications and limitations of the study as well as future research directions on the study of the appraisal of proactive behavior are discussed.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.format.extent436043 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleAppraising proactive behavior: Do supervisors’ attributionS of employees’ motives to engage in proactive behaviors matter?
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsProactive behavior, evaluation, motives
dc.subject.courseuuArbeids- en organisatiepsychologie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record