Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.contributor.advisorNilsen, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorWeigand, S.
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-08T08:48:46Z
dc.date.available2009-01-08T08:48:46Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttps://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/1645
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, I look at the connection between the selection of auxiliaries HAVE and BE and aspectual properties of sentences like telicity. In discuss arguments that have been proposed against such a relationship, and conclude that they may be wrong. I propose a theory in which there is such a relationship, in the framework of Ramchand's (2002) First Phase Syntax.
dc.description.sponsorshipUtrecht University
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleAuxiliary Selection and Telicity
dc.type.contentMaster Thesis
dc.rights.accessrightsOpen Access
dc.subject.keywordsauxiliary
dc.subject.keywordstelicity
dc.subject.courseuuLinguistics: the Study of the Language Faculty


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record